The court rejected PTI founder’s request for production in two cases of long march and vandalism and reserved the decision on acquittal.
Judicial Magistrate Shaista Kundi heard PTI founder’s plea for acquittal and production. The court rejected the request to appear in court.
On the plea of acquittal of founder PTI, lawyer Naeem Panjotha argued that in all the cases against founder PTI, there are only Emma’s cases. The role of the notification of implementation of Section 144 has not been issued nor informed. The plaintiff is the SHO who has no authority to register the case, not even the statements of the witnesses in the cases registered on the founding PTI.
Judge Shaista Kundi remarked that the founders of PTI have been acquitted in cases before.
The lawyer said that the PTI founder had been acquitted in several cases even before this.
The court reserved its decision on the plea of acquittal in the long march vandalism case of the PTI founder. Cases were registered against the PTI founder in the Sahala Lohi Bhir police station.
